Reliable Resources for Broadcast Political Coverage

Guidelines we followed for "Examples of Excellence"

  • Informational and useful

    Political coverage should be educational and informative. Information should be conveyed in a manner that explains how the political process and the election are relevant. For example: How will the state, city or nation change if Candidate 'A' wins? What will occur if a local referendum is passed? Focus less on the political game and more on the repercussions.

  • Substantive

    Substance is the important information that can help the electorate shape opinions and make decisions. Strong political reporting should allow time for candidates to explain points of view and rationale while keeping expert and pundit analysis to a minimum. Our RR advisors stress the need for the media to tone down pundit analysis.

  • Compelling

    Political stories should be clear and concise and easy to understand, yet still grab a viewer's attention. Stories that fail to attract the viewer and neglect to explain the relevance to the voter will not adequately educate the electorate.

  • Factual

    Political coverage should be accurate and objective. Ad watch should be factual and fair. Investigations should be balanced. Stories with a cynical tone don't educate. Instead, they turn off the voter and add to the vanishing voter effect. Heavy emphasis on analysis is not journalism. Any such 'analysis' should not be the focus of a story.

  • Don't "recycle the message":

    Ad watches and poll reporting tend to reinforce the original message of the ad or the poll. Studies clearly show ad watches leave viewers with a stronger impression of the original ad (accurate or inaccurate) rather than the story that tests the truth of the ad. The ad watches are important to set the record straight, yet reporting must be accurate and clear.

  • Give the 'horse-race' its due, but not more:

    Reporting the blueprint and status of a race is often newsworthy, but over emphasis on infighting and internal strategy and name-calling between candidates won't educate or inform viewers of the consequences of a race.

The RR videotape guidelines were created with guidance from members of the RR Advisory Board including:

Randy Covington, WIS-TV
Elaine Kim, UC Berkeley
Jeff Greenfield, CNN
Thomas Mann, The Brookings Inst.
Marty Haag, Belo
Dan Rosenheim, KPIX-TV
Valerie Hyman, Better News
Thomas Patterson, Harvard University
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
Larry Sabato, University of Virginia
Philip Seib, Marquette University

-Compiled by: Adam Symson, Producer RR Tape #1


Reliable Resources for Broadcast Political Coverage.
Contact us at enter@usc.edu.